Motivation, Self-confidence, and the Process Approach
in Korean University Writing Classes
กก
Rodney E. Tyson

Paper presented at the 1997 National Korea TESOL Conference
in Kyongju, October 3-5, 1997.


Abstract

        The literature on teaching writing in Asian settings indicates that both students and instructors often strongly resist many of the techniques and activities associated with the "process approach" in favor of a more traditional approach that emphasizes grammar and explicit error correction. In this paper, the author presents the results of a study of student attitudes toward a number of "process-oriented" techniques used in writing classes for two years at a major Korean university. Data, which include questionnaires, student reflective writing, andethnographic description, indicate that most students found many of the "process" techniques both helpful and motivating. Also, most students were very satisfied with the quality of their writing and felt, especially, that writing multiple drafts, emphasis placed on the "publication" of students' work, and instructor comments that focused more on content and organization than on grammatical error helped them to produce better compositions and develop more self-confidence in writing.
 
 

References

Allaei, S. K., & Connor, U. M. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms. The Writing Instructor, 10, 19-28.

Blanton, L. L. (1987). Reshaping ESL students' perceptions of writing. ELT Journal, 41(2), 112-188.

Boese, P., Byrne, M. E., & Silverman, L. (1997). The rewards of a publication of student writing. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 24(1), 42-46.

Brock, M. (1994). Reflections on change: Implementing the process approach in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 25(2), 51-70.

Caposella, T.-L. (1991). Students as sociolinguists: Getting real research from freshman writers. College Composition and Communication, 42(1), 75-79.

Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students' perception of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1-19.

Caudery, T. (1995). What the "process approach" means to practising teachers of second language writing skills. TESL-EJ. 1(4), 1-16.

Chenoweth, N. A. (1987). The need to teach rewriting. ELT Journal, 41(1), 25-29.

Crowe, C., & Peterson, K. (1995). Classroom research: Helping Asian students succeed in writing courses. Teaching English in the two-YearCollege, 22(1), 30-37.

Cumming, A. (1990). Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing, 7(1), 31-51.

Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.

Ferris, D. (1995). Teaching students to self-edit. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 18-22.

Hayward, M. (1990). Evaluation of essay prompts by nonnative speakers of English. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 753-758.

Johnson, D. M., & Roen, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Richness in Writing: Empowering ESL students. New York: Longman.

Jones, N. (1995). Business writing, Chinese students, and communicative language teaching. TESOL Journal, 4(3), 12-15.

Kong, N.-H. (1996). The communicative approach to Korean college English. English Teaching, 51(1), 97-118.

Kroll, B. (Ed.). (1990). Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203-218.

Lindemann, E. (1987). A rhetoric for writing teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Pennington, M. C., Brock, M. N., & Yue, F. (1996). Explaining Hong Kong students' response to process writing: An exploration of causes and outcomes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(3), 227-252.

Proett, J., & Gill, K. (1986). The writing process in action: A handbook for teachers. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-70.

Villamil, O. S., & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51-75.

White, A. S., & Caminero, R. (1995). Using process writing as a learning tool in the foreign language class. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 51(2), 323-329).

Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79-101.

Zamel, V. (1987). Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 697-715.

Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209-222.


Curriculum Vitae | Home