Rodney E. Tyson
กก
Doctoral dissertation,
University of Arizona, Tucson. December 1994.
Dissertation Committee:
Rudolph C. Troike (director), Muriel Saville-Troike, Jane H. Hill.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of language contact, particularly contact
with English, on the Korean language. One chapter reviews the historical
and sociocultural background of the three major influences on modern Korean--Chinese,
Japanese, and English. Another chapter discusses the patterns of English
lexical borrowing and semantic changes that occur during the borrowing
process, both in the English words and related Korean words in the same
semantic fields. A third chapter describes some other uses of English in
Korea, including advertising, product naming, and current slang.
Finally, a substantial part of the dissertation is devoted to a study of
the influence of contact with English on the Korean semantic field of color.
Data were elicited from forty-four consultants in two age groups (18-24
and 47-85) using Munsell color samples as stimulus materials in a three-part
interview procedure based on the work of MacLaury (1986, 1992) that asked
consultants to: (1) name 330 different loose color chips to determine their
individual vocabulary of color terms; (2) choose a focus for each term
from an array of the same color chips; and (3) map the range of each term
on the array. It was found that consultants varied greatly in the number
of color categories they used, with age, sex, level of education, and attitude
toward the topic as possible influences. A number of English color terms
were used by consultants of both sexes and in both age groups, and it is
suggested that two of these, orange and pink, have possibly become the
most basic terms for naming their categories for some of the consultants.
It is also suggested that these two terms, as well as contact with English
in general, are partly responsible for certain semantic changes in related
Korean words. Another specific finding was that Korean seems to have color
categories in addition to Berlin and Kay's (1969) eleven basic categories,
including LIGHT BLUE, DARK BLUE, and YELLOW-GREEN, which is similar to
the situation that Stanlaw (1987) found in Japanese.
References
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
MacLaury, R. E. (1986). Color in Mesoamerica, vol. I: A theory of composite categorization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
MacLaury, R. E. (1992). From brightness to hue: An explanatory model of color-category evolution. Current Anthropology, 33(2), 137-186.
Stanlaw, J. M. (1987). Color, culture, and contact: English loanwords and problems of color nomenclature in modern Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.